Literature Cited
(citations with * = citations in the
Result of Prior NSF Support)
Abascal,
F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. 2005. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models
of
protein
evolution. – Bioinformatics 21: 2104-2105.
Agassiz, L. 1833-43. Recherches sur les
Poissons Fossiles. – 5 vols., XCVII + 1520 pp., with
supplements. Neuchtel et Soleure
(Petitpierre).
Akaike, H. 1973.
Information theory and an extension of maximum likelihood. – In Petrov,
B. N. & Cski, F. (eds.). Proc. 2nd Internatl. Symp. on
Information Theory. Pp. 267-281. Akademia Kaido, Budapest.
Aldinger,
H. 1937. Permische Ganoidfische aus Ostgrnland. – Medd. Grnland 102:
1-392.
Alfaro, M.
E., Zoller, S. & Lutzoni, F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study
comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and
bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. – Molecular Biol.
Evol. 20: 255–266.
*Alvarado-Ortega, J., Ovalles-Damian, E. & Arratia, G. A review of the interrelationships of the order Ellimmichthyiformes. – In Arratia, G., Schultze, H.-P. & Wilson, M. V. H. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 4 — Systematics, Homology, and Nomenclature. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Mnchen. (Accepted for publication)
Arnason,
U., Gullberg, A. & Janke, A. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics of gnathostomous
(jawed)
fishes: old bones, new cartilage.
– Zool. Scripta 30: 249-255.
Arratia, G. 1991. The
caudal skeleton of Jurassic teleosts; a phylogenetic analysis. – In
Chang, M.-M., Liu, Y.-H. & Zhang, G.-R. (eds.): Early Vertebrates and
Related Problems in Evolutionary Biology. Pp. 249-340. Science Press, Beijing.
Arratia,
G. 1997. Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny. – Palaeo Ichthyologica
7: 1-168.
Arratia,
G. 1999. The monophyly of Teleostei and stem-group teleosts. Consensus and
disagreements. – In Arratia, G. & Schultze, H.-P. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 2 – Systematics and Fossil Record. Pp. 265-334. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Arratia, G. 2000. Remarkable teleostean fishes from the Late Jurassic of southern Germany and their phylogenetic relationships. – Mitt. Mus. Naturkd. Berlin. Geowiss. Reihe 3: 137-179.
Arratia, G. 2001. The sister-group of Teleostei: Consensus and disagreement. – J. Vert. Paleontol. 21 (4): 767-773.
*Arratia, G. 2004a. Ontogeny and phylogeny of teleosts with special reference to cypriniforms. – In Ext. Abstr. book 11th Europ. Congr. Ichthyol.: 1p. Tallinn, Estonia.
Arratia,
G. 2004b. Mesozoic halecostomes and the early radiation of teleosts. – In
Arratia, G. &
Tintori, A. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes
3 – Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. Pp. 279-315. Verlag
Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Arratia, G. 2005. Axial skeleton and associated elements: homologization and nomenclature of certain structures. – Fourth Internatl. Mtg. Mesozoic Fishes. Systematics, Homology, and Nomenclature, Madrid, Spain, extended Abstr.: 25.
*Arratia, G. 2005. The contribution of Late Jurassic fishes from Germany to understanding the evolutionary history of teleosts. – Zitteliana B 25: 1.
*Arratia, G. 2005. Impact
of fossils in elopomorph/osteoglossomorph phylogenies. – J. Vert.
Paleontol. 25, suppl. to nr. 3:
32A-33A.
*Arratia, G. 2006. Caudal skeleton in cypriniforms
and other ostariophysans: Distal radials. – Ann. Mtg. Amer. Soc.
Ichthyols. & Herpetols.: 1p. (Published online).
*Arratia, G. Impact of
fossils in elopomorph/osteoglossomorph phylogenies. – In Elliott, D. Yu, Y. & Maisey J. (eds.):
Morphology, Phylogeny and Paleobiogeography of Fossil Fishes. Verlag Dr. F.
Pfeil, Mnchen. (In review.)
*Arratia, G. Actinopterygian postcranial skeleton with special reference to fin rays and the problem of identifying homologies. – In Arratia, G., Schultze, H.-P. & Wilson, M. V. H. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 4 — Systematics, Homology, and Nomenclature. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen. (Submitted.)
*Arratia,
G. The varasichthyid and other crossognathiform fishes at the break up of
Pangea. – In Cavin, L., Longbotton, A. & Richter, M. (eds.): Fishes
at the Beak up of Pangea. Palaeontol. Assoc., London. (In press.)
*Arratia, G. Actinopterygian
rays and fulcra. New information and interpretations. – In International
Meeting on Early Vertebrates. Uppsala, August-2007 (Submitted.)
*Arratia, G.,
Alvarado-Ortega, J. 2006. Early diversification of ictiobin fishes in North
America and patterns of distribution. – J. Vert. Paleontol. 26, suppl. to
nr. 3: 38A.
Arratia,
G. &
Cloutier, R. 1996. A reassessment
of the morphology of Cheirolepis canadensis
(Actinopterygii). – In Schultze,
H.-P. & Cloutier, R. (eds.): Devonian Fishes and Plants of Miguasha, Quebec, Canada. Pp.
165–197. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Arratia, G. & Cloutier, R. 2004. A new cheirolepidid fish
from the Middle-Upper Devonian of Red Hill, Nevada, USA. – In Arratia,
G., Wilson, M. V. H. & Cloutier, R. (eds.): Recent Advances in the Origin
and Early Radiation of Vertebrates. Pp. 583-598; Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Arratia, G., Coburn, M.
& Mabee, P. Cypriniformes Tree of Life: Distal radials in Cypriniformes:
Phylogenetic signal at the tail end. – Ann. Mtg. Amer. Soc. Ichthyols.
& Herpetols. (Submitted.).
*Arratia, G. & A.
Herzog. A new halecomorph fish from the Middle Triassic of Switzerland and its
systematic implications. – J. Vert. Paleontol. (In review.)
*Arratia, G. &
Mayden, R. 2004. Recombining fossil and recent evidence in phylogenetic studies
of cypriniforms. – In Ext. Abstr. book 11th Europ. Congr. Ichthyol.: 1p.
Tallinn, Estonia.
*Arratia,
G. & Schultze, H.-P. 2005. Controversies around basal actinopterygian
relationships. –
2005 Joint Mtg.
Amer. Soc. Ichthyols. & Herpetols., Tampa, Florida, Abstr.: 1 p.
*Arratia,
G. & Schultze, H.-P. 2007. Eurycormus – Eurypoma, two Jurassic
actinopterygian genera with mixed identity. – Fossil Record 10 (1):
17-37.
Basden,
A. M., Young, G. C., Coates, M. I. & Ritchie, A. 2000. The most primitive
osteichthyan
braincase? – Nature 403:
185-188.
Beltan, L. 1996. Overview
of systematics, paleobiology, and paleoecology of Triassic fishes of
northwestern Madagascar. – In Arratia, G. & Viohl, G. (eds.):
Mesozoic Fishes – Systematics and Paleoecology. Pp. 479-500. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Bemis, W. E., Findeis, E.
K. & Grande, L. 1997. An overview of Acipenseriformes. – Environm.
Biol. Fishes 48: 25-71.
*Bemis, W. E. &
Forey, P. L. 2001. Occipital structure and the posterior limits of the skull in
actinopterygians. – In Ahlberg, P. (ed.): Major Events in Early
Vertebrate Evolution: Palaeontology, Phylogeny, Genetics and Development. Pp. 41-62. Taylor and Francis, London.
*Bemis, W. E. &
Grande, L. 1999. Development of the median fins of the North American
paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), with comments on the lateral fin-fold hypothesis.
– In Arratia, G. & Schultze, H.-P. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 2
– Systematics and Fossil
Record. Pp 41-68. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Bemis, W. E. &
Grande, L. 2002. Structure and development of trunk scales of the longnose gar,
Lepisosteus osseus (Ginglymodi: Lepisosteidae). – J. Vert. Paleontol. 22
(suppl. to 3): 36A.
*Bemis, W. E. & Grande, L. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among the living species of gars (Actinopterygii: Lepisosteidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. – Abstr. book, Ann. Mtg. Amer. Soc. Ichthyols. Herpetols.; Manaus, June 2003.
*Bemis,
W. E., Hilton, E. J., Brown, B., Arrindell, R., Richmond, A. M., Little, C. D.,
Grande, L.,
Forey, P. L. & Nelson, G. J.
(2004). Methods for preparing dry, partially articulated skeletons of
osteichthyans, with notes on making Ridewood dissections of the cranial
skeleton. – Copeia 2004: 603-609.
*Berendzen, P. B. & Dimmick, W. W. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Pleuronectiformes based on molecular evidence. – Copeia 2002 (3): 642-652.
*Bessert,
M., Sitzman, C. & Ort, G. 2006. Avoiding paralogy: diploid loci for
allotetraploid blue sucker fish (Cycleptus elongatus, Catostomidae).
– Conservation Genetics (In
press, published online 21 Oct 2006.).
Brandley, M. C., Schmitz, A. & Reeder, T. W.
2005. Partitioned Bayesian
analyses, partition
choice,
and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. – Syst. Biol. 54:
373–390.
*Braun, C. & Grande, T. Evolution of peripheral mechanisms for the enhancement of
sound reception. – Fish Bioacoustics. (In press.)
Bremer,
K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic
reconstruction.
– Evolution 42: 795-803.
Brito,
P. 1997. Rvision des Aspidorhynchidae (Pisces, Actinopterygii) du Msozoque:
Ostologie, relations
phylogntiques, donnes environnementales et biogographiques. –
Geodiversitas 19 (4): 681-772.
*Broughton, R. E., Milam,
J. E. & Roe, B. A. 2001. The complete sequence of the zebrafish
(Danio rerio) mitochondrial genome
and evolutionary patterns in vertebrate mitochondrial
DNA. –
Genome Research 11: 1958-1967.
*Broughton,
R. E. & Reneau, P. C. 2006. Spatial covariation of mutation and
nonsynonymous
substitution
rates in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:
1516-1524.
*Broughton, R. E.,
Richter, S. C., Mayden, R. L. & Gold, J.R. Complex mitochondrial
history of cyprinid fishes (genus Cyprinella) from the southwestern United
States and northern Mexico. – Copeia. (Submitted.)
*Chen, P. 2006.
Biodiversity of fossil and living ostariophysans in Asia. – J. Vert.
Paleontol. 26, suppl. to nr. 3: 49A.
*Chen, P.
Oldest Mylopharyngodon (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) and its biogeographical implication
based on ecological niche modeling. – J. Vert. Paleontol. (Submitted.)
*Chen, W.-J., Ort, G.
& Meyer, A. 2004. Novel evolutionary relationship among four fish model
systems.
– Trends in Genetics 20 (9): 424-431.
*Chen, W-J., Ruiz-Carus, R. R. & Ort, G. 2007. Relationships among four genera of mojarras (Teleostei: Perciformes: Gerreidae) from the western Atlantic and their tentative placement among percomorph fishes . – J. Fish Biol. (In press.)
Cloutier,
R. 2000a. Actinopterygians. – In Singer, R. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Paleontology. Vol. 1:
11-16; Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers,
Chicago.
Cloutier, R. 2000b. Osteichthyans. – In Singer, R. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Paleontology. Vol. 1:
813-815; Fitzroy Dearborn
Publishers, Chicago.
Cloutier,
R. & Arratia, G. 2004. Early diversification of actinopterygians. –
In Arratia, G., Wilson,
M. V. H. & Cloutier, R. (eds.):
Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates. Pp. 217-270.
Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Coates,
M. I. 1998. Actinopterygians from the Namurian of Bearsden, Scotland, with
comments
on early actinopterygian
neurocrania. – Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 122: 27-59.
Coates,
M. I. 1999. Endocranial preservation of a Carboniferous actinopterygian from
Lancashire, UK, and the
interrelationships of primitive actinopterygians. – Philos. Trans. Roy.
Soc. London B 354: 435-462.
*Concheiro Prez, G. A.,
Rican, O., Ort, G., Bermingham, E., Doadrio, I. & Zardoya, R. 2006. Phylogeny
and biogeography of 91 species of heroine cichlids (Teleostei: Cichlidae) based
on sequences of the cytochrome b gene. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. (In press, corrected
proof published online 22 Aug 2006.)
Cope,
E. D. 1887. Zittels Manual of Palaeontology. – Amer. Naturalist 21:
1014-1019.
Daeschler,
E. B. 2000. An early actinopterygian fish from the Catskill Formation (Late
Devonian,
Famennian) in Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
– Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 150: 181-192.
Dietze,
K. 2000. A revision of paramblypterid and amblypterid actinopterygians from
Upper
Carboniferous-Lower Permian
lacustrine deposits of central Europe. – Palaeontology 43: 927-966.
Driskell, A. C.,
An, C., Burleigh, J. G., McMahon, M. M., OMeara, B. C. & Sanderson, M. J.
2004. Prospects for building the
Tree of Life from large sequence databases. – Science 306:
1172–1174.
Erixon, P., Svennblad,
B., Britton, T. & Oxelman, B. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior
probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. – Syst. Biol.
52: 665–673.
*Espinoza, R. E., Wiens, J. J. &
Tracy, C. R. 2004. Recurrent
evolution of herbivory in small,
cold-climate lizards: breaking the
ecophysiological rules of reptilian herbivory. – Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 101: 16819-16824.
Felsenstein,
J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.
–
Evolution 39: 783-791.
Felsenstein,
J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Assoc., Inc., Sunderland, MA.
Filleul, A.
2001. Analyse critique des synapomorphies des Elopomorphes et analyse
phylogntique du groupe. – Cybium 4 (3): 75-83.
Filleul, A.
& Lavou, S. 2001. Basal teleosts and the question of elopomorph monophyly.
– C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sci de la vie 324: 393-399.
Forey, P., Littlewood, D. T. J., Ritchie, P. & Meyer, A. 1996. Interrelationships of elopomorph fishes. – In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. (eds.). Interrelationships of Fishes. Pp. 175-191; Academic Press, San Diego.
Gardiner,
B.G. 1967. Further notes on palaeoniscoid fishes with a classification of the
Chondrostei. – Bull. Br. Mus.
(Natur. Hist.), Geol. 14: 146-206.
Gardiner,
B. G. & Schaeffer, B. 1989. Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian
fishes. –
Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 97: 135-187.
Gardiner,
B. G., Schaeffer, B. & Masserie, J. A. 2005. A review of the lower
actinopterygian
phylogeny.
– Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 144: 511-525.
*Grande, L. & Bemis,
W. E. 1998. A comprehensive
phylogenetic study of amiid fishes
(Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal
anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected
patterns of natural history. – Mem. 4: I-X, 1-690;
suppl. J. Vert. Paleontol. 18 (1).
*Grande,
L. & Bemis, W. E. 1999. Historical biogeography and historical paleoecology
of
Amiidae and other halecomorph
fishes. – In Arratia, G. & Schultze, H.-P. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes
2 – Systematics and Fossil
Record. Pp 413-424. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Grande, L., Fan, J.,
Yabumoto, Y. & Bemis, W. E. 2002. Protopsephurus liui, a well-preserved
primitive paddlefish (Acipenseriformes: Polyodontidae) from the early Cretaceous
of China. – J. Vert. Paleontol. 22: 209-237.
*Grande, L. & Hilton,
E. J. 2006. An exquisitely preserved skeleton representing a primitive sturgeon from
the Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation of Montana (Acipenseriformes:
Acipenseridae: n. gen. and sp.). –
J. Paleontol., Mem. 65, suppl. to 80 (4): 1-39.
*Grande, T. & Braun, C. 2002. Evolution of the Weberian apparatus. – Bioacoustics 12 (2002):
120-122.
*Grande, T. & *Grande, L. 2005. Interrelationships and historical biogeography of
Notogoneus Cope ,1885 (Ostariophysi: Gonorynchidae). – In Fourth Internatl. Mtg. Mesozoic Fishes – Systematics, Homology, and Nomenclature, Abstr.: 23-25.
*Grande, T. & Grande, L. Reevaluation of the gonorynchiform genera Rammalichthys Gayet, 1982 and Judeichthys Gayet, 1985, with comments on the families Charitosomidae Gayet, 1993 and Gonorynchidae Scopoli ,1777. – In Arratia, G., Schultze, H.-P. & Wilson, M. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 4 – Systematics, Homology, and Nomenclature. (Submitted.)
*Grande, T., Laten, H. & Lopez, A. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of extant esocid
species (Teleostei: Salmoniformes) based on morphological and molecular characters. –
Copeia. 2004 (4): 743 – 757.
*Grande, T. & de Pinna, M. 2004. The evolution of the Weberian apparatus: a phylogenetic
perspective. – In Arratia, G. & Tintori, A. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 3 – Systematics and
Biodiversity. Pp. 429 – 448. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Grande, T. & Shardo, J. 2002. Morphology and development of the postcranial skeleton in the
channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes). – Fieldiana 1518 (99): 1-
30.
*Grande, T. & Young, B. 2004. The ontogeny and homology of the Weberian apparatus in the
zebrafish Danio rerio (Ostariophysi: Cypriniformes). – Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 140: 241 – 254.
*Guilgur, L. G., Ort,
G., Strobl-Mazzulla, P. H., Fernandino, J. I., Miranda, L. A. & Somoza, G.
2007. Characterization of the cDNAs encoding three GnRH forms in the pejerrey
fish Odontesthes bonariensis (Atheriniformes) and the evolution of GnRH
precursors. – J. Mol. Evol.
(In press.)
*Hilton, E. J. 2001.
Tongue bite apparatus of osteoglossomorph fishes: Variation of a character
complex. – Copeia 2001 (2): 372-382.
*Hilton, E. J. 2002a.
Observations on rostral canal bones of two species of Acipenser (Actinopterygii,
Acipenseriformes). – Copeia 2002 (1): 213-219.
*Hilton, E. J. 2002b.
Osteology of the extant North American fishes of the genus Hiodon Lesueur 1818 (Teleostei:
Osteoglossomorpha: Hiodontiformes). – Fieldiana (Zool.) N. Ser. 100:
1-142.
*Hilton, E. J. 2002c.
Review of: Mesozoic Fishes: Systematics and Paleoecology. – Copeia 2002
(4): 539-542.
*Hilton, E. J. 2003.
Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living
bony-tongue
fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha). – Zool. J. Linn.
Soc. 137: 1-100.
*Hilton, E. J. 2004. The
caudal skeleton of Acipenseriformes (Actinopterygii: Chondrostei): recent
advances and new observations. – In Arratia, G., Wilson, M. V. H. &
Cloutier, R. (eds.): Recent
Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates. Pp. 599-618. Verlag
Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Hilton, E. J. 2005.
Observations on the skulls of sturgeons (Acipenseridae): shared similarities of
Pseudoscaphirhynchus kaufmanni and juvenile specimens of Acipenser stellatus. – Environm. Biol. Fishes 72: 135–144.
*Hilton, E. J. &
Bemis, W. E. 1999. Skeletal variation in shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser
brevirostrum) from the Connecticut River: Implications for comparative osteological
study of fossil and living fishes. – In Arratia, G. & Schultze, H.-P.
(eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 2 –
Systematics and Fossil Record. Pp. 69-94. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Hilton, E. J. &
Bemis, W. E. 2005. Grouped tooth
replacement in the oral jaws of the tripletail, Lobotes surinamensis (Perciformes,
Lobotidae), with a discussion of its proposed relationship to Datnioides. – Copeia 2005:
664-671.
*Hilton, E. J., Britz,
R., Johnson, G. D. & Forey, P. L. 2007. Clarification of the
occipito-vertebral region of Arapaima gigas (Osteoglossomorpha: Osteoglossidae)
through developmental osteology. – Copeia 2007: 218-224.
*Hilton, E. J. & Cox
Fernandes, C. 2006. Sexual dimorphism in Apteronotus bonapartii (Gymnotiformes:
Apteronotidae). – Copeia 2006: 826-833.
*Hilton, E. J., Cox
Fernandes, C., Sullivan, J. P., Lundberg, J. G. & Campos-da-Paz, R. 2007. Redescription of Orthosternarchus
tamandua (Boulenger,
1898) (Gymnotiformes, Apteronotidae), with a review of its ecology, electric
organ discharges, external morphology, osteology, and phylogenetic affinities.
– Proc. Acad. Natur. Sci. Philadelphia 156: 1-27.
*Hilton, E. J. &
Forey, P. L. 2005. Contributions of Walter G. Ridewood to systematic
comparative anatomy, especially of the osteology of lower vertebrates. – J. Natur. Hist. 39: 641-655.
*Hilton, E. J. &
Grande, L. 2001. Osteology of Eohiodon (Teleostei: Hiodontiformes) based
on new acid-prepared specimens from the Green River Formation (Eocene) of
Wyoming. – J. Vert. Paleont. 21 (suppl. to 3): 61A-62A.
*Hilton, E. J. &
Grande, L. 2006. Review of the fossil record of sturgeons, family
Acipenseridae (Actinopterygii: Acipenseriformes), from North America. –
J. Paleontol. 80: 672-683.
*Hilton, E. J., Grande,
L. & Bemis, W. E. 2004. Morphology of Coccolepis bucklandi Agassiz, 1843
(Actinopterygii, Coccolepidae) from the Solnhofen lithographic limestone
deposits (Upper Jurassic, Germany). – In Arratia, G. & Tintori, A. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 3
– Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. Pp. 209-238. Verlag
Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Hilton, E. J. & Johnson, G. D. 2007. When two equals three:
developmental osteology and homology of the caudal skeleton in carangid fishes
(Perciformes: Carangidae). – Evol. Dev. 9: 178-189.
*Hilton, E. J. &
Kley, N. J. 2005. Osteology of the quillfish, Ptilichthys goodei (Perciformes:
Zoarcoidei: Ptilichthyidae). – Copeia 2005: 571-584.
Hipp,
A., Hall, J. & Sytsma, K. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy:
revisiting the
incongruence
length difference test. – Syst. Biol. 53: 81-89.
*Holcroft, N. I. 2004. A molecular test of
alternative hypotheses of tetraodontiform
(Acanthomorpha: Tetraodontiformes)
sister group relationships using data from the RAG1 gene. – Mol.
Phylogenet. Evol. 32: 749-760.
*Holcroft, N. I. 2005. A molecular analysis of the interrelationships of
tetraodontiform fishes
(Acanthomorpha:
Tetraodontiformes). – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34: 525-544.
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Rannala, B.
2004. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities. – Syst.
Biol. 53: 904–913.
Huelsenbeck,
J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes. Bayesian inference of phylogenetic
trees. –
Bioinformatics 17: 754-755. (3.0
available at: http://morphbank.ebc.uu.se/mrbayes/info.php).
Hurley, I. A., Lockridge Mueller,
R., Dunn, K. A., Schmidt, E. J., Friedmann, M., Ho, R. K., Prince, V. E., Yang,
Z., Thomas, M. G. & Coates, M. L. 2007. A new time-scale for ray-finned
fish evolution. – Proc. Roy. Soc. B 274: 489-498.
Inoue, J. G. &
Miya, M. 2001. Phylogeny of basal teleosts, with special reference to the
Elopomorpha. – Japan. J.
Ichthyol. 48 (2): 75-91.
Inoue, J. G.,
Miya, M., Tsukamoto, K. & Nishida, M. 2001. A mitogenomic perspective
on the basal teleostean phylogeny: Resolving higher-level relationships with
longer DNA sequences. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
20: 275-285.
Inoue, J. G., Miya, M., Tsukamoto, K. & Nishida,
M. 2003. Basal actinopterygian relationships: a
mitogenomic perspective
on the phylogeny of the "ancient fish". – Mol. Phylogenet.
Evol. 26: 110-120.
Inoue,
J. G., Miya, M., Tsukamoto, K. & Nishida, M. 2004. Mitogenomic evidence for
the monophyly of elopomorph fishes (Teleostei) and the evolutionary origin of
the leptocephalos larva. –
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 36: 274-286.
*Jang-Liaw, N.-H., Tang,
K. L., Hui, C.-F. & Shao, K.-T. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of 48 species of
damselfishes (Perciformes: Pomacentridae) using 12S mtDNA sequences. –
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25: 445-454.
Janvier, P. 1996. Early Vertebrates. –
393 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford. .
Jarvik,
E. 1980. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates. Vol. 1: VIII + 575 pp.
Academic
Press, London, New York, Toronto,
Sydney, San Francisco.
Jessen, H. 1966. Die Crossopterygier des Oberen Plattenkalkes (Devon) der
Bergisch-
Gladbach-Paffrather Mulde (Rheinisches
Schiefergebirge) unter Bercksichtigung von amerikanischem und europischem Onychodus-Material.
– Ark. Zool.
18: 305-389.
Jobb,
G. 2005. TREEFINDER version of October 2005. Munich, Germany. –
Distributed
by the author
at www.treefinder.de
Keane,
T. M., Naughton, T. J. &
McInerney, J. O. 2004. ModelGenerator: amino acid and
nucleotide
substitution model selection. – Natl. Univ. Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland.
*Kjer, K. M., Swingonova,
Z., LaPolla, J. & Broughton, R. E.
Why weight? – Mol. Phylogenet.
Evol.
(Submitted.)
Kumar,
S., Tamura, K. & Nei, M. 2004. MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular
evolutionary
analysis and
sequence alignment. – Briefings in Bioinformatics 5: 150-163.
Lambe,
L. M. 1910. Palaeoniscid fishes from the Albert Shales of New Brunswick.
– Contrib.
Canad. Palaeontol., Mem. 3, 3: 9-69.
Lauder,
G. V. & Liem, K. F. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian
fishes. – Bull. Mus. Comp.
Zool. 150: 95-197.
L,
H. L. V., Lecointre, G. & Perasso, R. 1993. A 28S rRNA-based phylogeny of
the
gnathostomes: First steps in the
analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms.
– Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2: 31-51.
Lecointre, G. & Nelson, G. J. 1996. Clupeomorpha, sister-group of Ostariophysi. – In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. (eds.): Interrelationships of Fishes. Pp. 163-174. Academic Press, San Diego.
Lehman, J.-P. 1952. tude complmentaire des poissons de lՃotrias de Madagascar. – Kgl. Sv. VetkapsAkad. Handl., 4. Ser. 2 (6): 201 pp.
2001. A likelihood
approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological
character data.
– Syst. Biol. 50: 913-925.
*Li, C., Ort, G., Potmesil, F.
& Lu, G. Development of genome-scale nuclear gene
markers for ray-finned fish
phylogenetics. (Submitted.)
*Li, C. & Ort, G.
2006. Molecular phylogeny of Clupeiformes (Actinopterygii) inferred from nuclear
and mitochondrial DNA sequences. –
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. (In press, corrected proof online 7 Nov 2006.)
*Li, C., Ort, G., Zhang, G. & Lu, G. A practical approach to phylogenomics: the phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) as a case study. – BMC Evolutionary Biology. (In press.)
Li,
G.-Q. 1994. New osteoglossomorphs (Teleostei) from the Upper Cretaceous and
Lower
Tertiary
of North America and their phylogenetic significance. – Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. 290 pp. University of Alberta, Edmonton,
Canada.
Li,
G.-Q. 1996. A new species of Late Cretaceous osteoglossid (Teleostei) from the
Oldman Formation of Alberta, Canada, and its phylogenetic relationships.
– In Arratia, G. & Viohl, G. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes – Systematics and Paleoecology.
Pp. 285-298. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Li,
G.-Q. & Wilson, M. V. H. 1996. Phylogeny of the Osteoglossomorpha. –
In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. (eds.):
Interrelationships of Fishes. Pp. 163-174; Academic Press, San Diego.
Li, G.-Q. & Wilson, M. V. H. 1999. Early divergence of Hiodontiformes sensu stricto in East Asia and phylogeny of some Late Mesozoic teleosts from China. – In Arratia, G. & Schultze, H.-P. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes 2 – Systematics and Fossil Record. Pp. 369-384. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Long,
J. A. 1988. New palaeoniscoid fishes from the Late Devonian and Early
Carboniferous of
Victoria. – Mem. Ass.
Australas. Palaeontol. 7: 1-64.
*Lpez, A., Chen, W.-J.,
& Ort, G. 2004. Esociform phylogeny. – Copeia 2004 (3): 449-464.
Lund,
R. 2000. The new actinopterygian order Guildayichthyiformes from the Lower
Carboniferous of Montana (USA).
– Geodiversitas 22: 171-206.
Lund,
R., Poplin, C. & McCarthy, K. 1995. Preliminary analysis of the
interrelationships of some
Paleozoic Actinopterygii. –
Geobios, Mem. Spec. 19: 215-220.
Lund, R. & Poplin, C.
1997. The rhadinichthyids (palaeoniscoid actinopterygians) from the Bear Gulch
Limestone of Montana (USA, Lower Carboniferous). – J. Vert. Paleontol.
17: 466-486.
*Mabee, P., Arratia, G., Coburn, M., Haendel, M., Hilton, E., Lundberg, J., Mayden, R., Rios, N. & Westerfield, M. Connecting evolutionary morphology to genomics using ontologies: A case study from Cypriniformes including zebrafish. – J. Exp. Zool.. Part B: Mol. & Devep. Evol. (In press.)
*Mabee, P., Arratia, G., Coburn, M., Conway, K., Grey, E., Mayden, R., Rios, N. & Simon, A. Collaboration using a Web-based matrix tool: Results from a survey of gill arch features. – 2007- Ann. Mtg. Amer. Soc. Ichthyols. & Herpetols. (Submitted.).
*Mabee, P., Westerfield, M., Haendel, M., Arratia, G., Coburn, M., Hilton, E., Lundberg, J., Lushbough, C., Mayden, R. & Rios, N. 2005. Relating evolutionary and model organism phenotypes using ontologies. – First Internatl. Biocurators Mtg. Abstr. Asilomar, CA.
*Mabee, P., Westerfield, M., Haendel, M., Arratia, G., Coburn, M., Hilton, E., Lundberg, J., Lushbough, C., Mayden, R. & Rios, N. 2006. Integrating CToL-related studies with available phenotype and genomics databases for the zebrafish. – In: Zebrafish Symposium. Abstr. Soc. Integrative a. Comp. Biol. mtg. Tampa, FL.
Maisey,
J. G. 1986. Heads and tails: a chordate phylogeny. – Cladistics 2:
201-256.
Maisey,
J. G. 1991. Santana Fossils: An Illustrated Atlas. – 459 pp. T.F.A. Publications,
Neptune City,
NJ.
Maisey,
J. G. 2001. A primitive chondrichthyan braincase from the Middle Devonian of
Bolivia. –
In Ahlberg, P. E. (ed.): Major
Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution. Palaeontology, Phylogeny, Genetics and
Development. Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. Ser. 61:2 63-288. Taylor & Francis,
London, New York.
Maisey,
J. G. & Anderson, M. E. 2001. A primitive chondrichthyan braincase from the
early
Devonian of South
Africa. – J. Vert. Paleontol. 21: 702-713.
Miya, M., Takeshima, H., Endo, H., Ishiguro, N. B.,
Inue, J. G. et al. 2003. Major patterns of
higher teleostean
phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial sequences.
– Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26: 121-38.
Mller, K. 2005a. Incorporating information from length mutational events into phylogenetic analysis . – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38: 667-676.
Mller, K. 2005b. SeqState – primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. – Applied Bioinformatics 4: 65-69.
National
Academy of Sciences. 1998. Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science.
National
Academy Press, Washington, DC.
National
Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. National Research
Council,
Washington, DC.
National
Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A
Guide for
Teaching and Learning. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Nelson,
G. J. 1969. Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the
classification of
vertebrates. – Bull. Amer. Mus.
Natur. Hist.
141: 475-552.
Nelson, J. 2006. Fishes of the World.
– 4th ed., xix + 601 pp; J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Nixon, K. C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet,
a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. – Cladistics 15:
407–414.
Noack,
K., Zardoya, R. & Meyer, A. 1996. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence
of the
bichir (Polypterus ornatipinnis), a basal ray-finned
fish: ancient establishment of the consensus vertebrate gene order. –
Genetics 144: 1165-1180.
Normark,
B. B., McCune, A. R. & Harrison, R. G. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of
neopterygian fishes, inferred from
mitochondrial DNA sequences. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 8: 819-834.
Nursall,
J. R. 1996. The phylogeny of pycnodont fishes. – In Arratia, G. &
Viohl, G. (eds.):
Mesozoic Fishes – Systematics
and Paleoecology. Pp. 125-152. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest 2.0. Program distributed by the author. – Evolutionary
Biology Centre, Uppsala University. (http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html).
Nylander, J. A. A.,
Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Nieves-Aldrey, J. L. 2004. Bayesian
phylogenetic
analysis of combined data. – Syst. Biol. 53: 47–67.
Olsen,
P. 1984. The skull and the pectoral girdle of the parasemionotid fish Watsonulus
eugnathoides from the Early Triassic
Sakamena Group of Madagascar, with comments on the relationships of the
holostean fishes. – J. Vert.
Paleontol. 4: 481-499.
*Ovalles-Damian, E., Arratia, G. & Alvarado-Ortega, J. 2006. Paraclupeids of El Espinal Quarry (Mexico), and the interrelationships of Ellimmichthyiformes. – J. Vert. Paleontol. 26, suppl. to nr. 3: 108A.
Patterson,
C. 1973. Interrelationships of holosteans. – In Greenwood, P. H., Miles,
R. S. &
Patterson, C. (eds.): Interrelationships
of Fishes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53, Suppl. 1: 233-305. Academic Press, London.
Patterson, C. 1977. The
contribution of paleontology to teleostean phylogeny. – In Hecht, M. K.,
Goody, P. C. & Hecht, B. M. (eds.): Major Patterns of Vertebrate Evolution.
Pp. 579-643. Plenun Press, New York.
Patterson,
C. 1982. Morphology and interrelationships of primitive actinopterygian fishes.
–
Amer. Zool. 22: 241-259.
Patterson,
C. & Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic
teleost
fishes and the theory and practice
of classifying fossils. – Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 158: 81-172.
Phillipe, H., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E.,
Lopez, P., Holland, P. W. H. & Casane, D. 2004. Phylogenomics of
eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. – Mol. Biol.
Evol. 21: 1740-1752.
Pinna, M. de. 1996. Teleostean monophyly.
– In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. (eds.):
Interrelationships of Fishes. Pp. 147-162. Academic Press, San Diego.
Poplin, C. & Lund, R. 2000. Two new deep-bodied palaeoniscoid actinopterygians from Bear Gulch (Montana, USA, Lower Carboniferous). – J. Vert. Paleontol. 20: 428-449.
Posada,
D. & Crandall, K. A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA
substitutions. –
Bioinformatics 14(9): 817-818.
(ModelTest 3.06, 2001 is available at: http://inbio.byu.edu/Faculty/kac/crandall_lab/modeltest.htm.)
*Rages, S. & Arratia,
G. Cypriniformes Tree of Life: Caudal Fin Rays in Cypriniformes: A character
complex of potential phylogenetic importance. – Ann. Mtg. Amer. Soc.
Ichthyols. & Herpetols. (Submitted.)
Rasmussen,
A.-S. & Arnason, U. 1999. Phylogenetic studies of complete mitochondrial
DNA
molecules place cartilaginous fishes
within the tree of bony fishes. – J. Mol. Evol. 48: 118-123.
Rasmussen,
A.-S., Janke, A. & Arnason, U. 1998. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of the
hagfish (Myxine glutinosa) and vertebrate
phylogeny. – J. Mol. Evol. 46: 382-388.
Remm, M., Storm, C. E. V.
& Sonnhammer, E. L. L.. 2001. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs
from pairwise species comparisons. – J. Mol. Biol. 314: 1041-1052
*Richter, S.C., Crother
B.I & Broughton, R.E. Genetic consequences of population reduction
and isolation in a critically endangered frog. – Conservation
Genetics. (submitted)
Rokas, A., Williams, B.
L., King, N. & Carroll, S. B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving
incongruence in molecular phylogenies. – Nature 425: 798-804.
Sanderson,
M. & Shafer, H. B. 2002. Troubleshooting molecular phylogenetic analyses.
– Ann.
Rev. Ecol.
Syst. 33: 49-72
Schaeffer,
B. 1973. Interrelationships of chondrosteans. – In Greenwood, P. H.,
Miles, R. S. &
Patterson, C. (eds.):
Interrelationships of Fishes. Pp. 207-226. Academic Press, London.
Schultze,
H.-P. 1968. Palaeoniscoidea-Schuppen aus dem Unterdevon Australiens und
Kanadas und aus dem Mitteldevon
Spitzbergens. – Bull. Br. Mus. (Natur. Hist.), Geol. 16: 343-368.
Schultze,
H.-P. 1992. Early Devonian
actinopterygians (Osteichthyes, Pisces) from Siberia. – In
Mark-Kurik, E. (ed.): Fossil Fishes as Living
Animals. Academia 1: 233-242. Acad. Sci. Estonia, Tallinn.
*Schultze, H.-P. &
Arratia, G. 2006. Analyses of lower actinopterygian interrelationships.
Contradictory hypotheses. – J. Vert. Paleontol. 26, suppl. to nr. 3:
122A.
Schultze,
H.-P. & Cumbaa, S. 2001. Dialipina and the characters of basal
actinopterygians. – In
Ahlberg, P. E. (ed.): Major Events
in Early Vertebrate Evolution. Palaeontology, Phylogeny, Genetics and
Development. Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. Ser. 61: 315-332. Taylor & Francis,
London, New York.
Sewertzoff,
A. N. 1925. The place of the cartilaginous ganoids in the system and the
evolution
of the Osteichthyes. – J.
Morphol. Physiol. 38: 105-105.
Shen,
M. 1996. Fossil 'osteoglossomorphs' from East Asia and their implications on
teleostean
phylogeny.
– In Arratia, G. & Viohl, G. (eds.): Mesozoic Fishes - Systematics
and
Paleoecology.
Pp. 261-272. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Mnchen.
Sikes, D. S., & P. O.
Lewis. 2001. PAUPRat: PAUP implementation of the parsimony ratchet.
Beta software, version 1. Distributed by th0e authors. Dept.
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Univ. Connecticut, Storrs.
*Smith, S. A., Arif, S., Nieto Montes de Oca, A. & Wiens, J. J. A
phylogenetic hotspot for evolutionary novelty in Middle American treefrogs.
– Evolution (Submitted.)
*Smith, S. A., Nieto Montes de Oca,
A., Reeder, T. W. & Wiens, J. J. 2007. A phylogenetic
perspective on elevational species
richness patterns in Middle American treefrogs: why so
few species in lowland tropical
rainforests? – Evolution (In press.)
*Smith, S. A., Stephens, P. R. & Wiens, J. J. 2005. Replicate
patterns of species richness, historical biogeography, and phylogeny in
Holarctic treefrogs. – Evolution 59: 2433–2450.
Stamatakis,
A. 2006. Developing and using RAxML for large-scale phylogeny reconstruction
on
the CIPRES
cluster at the San Diego Supercomputing Center.
http://www.phylo.org/news/RAxML.html
*Steinauer, M. L.,
Nickol, B. B., Broughton, R. E. & Orti, G. 2005. First
sequenced mitochondrial genome of an acanthocephalan parasite. – J. Mol.
Evol. 60: 706-715.
*Stephens, P. R. &
Wiens, J. J. 2003. Explaining
species richness from continents to communities: the time-for-speciation effect
in emydid turtles. – American Naturalist 161: 112–128.
*Stephens,
P. R. & Wiens, J. J. 2004.
Convergence, divergence, and homogenization in the ecological structure
of emydid turtle communities: the effects of phylogeny and dispersal. –American Naturalist 164:
244–254.
*Stiassny, M. L. J.,
Wiley, E. O., Johnson, G. D. &
de Carvalho, M. R. 2004. Gnathostome fishes. – In Cracraft, J. (ed.):
Assembling The Tree of Life. Pp. 410-429. Oxford Univ. Press.
Struck,
T. H., Purschke, G. &
Halanych, K. M. 2006.
Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) and
exploring data
congruence using a partition addition bootstrap alteration (PABA)
approach.
– Syst.
Biol. 55: 1-20.
Swofford, D. L. 2002.
PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony*, version 4.0b10. –
Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Sytchevskaya,
E. 1999. Freshwater fish fauna from the Triassic of northern Asia. – In
Arratia,
G. & Schultze, H.-P. (eds.):
Mesozoic Fishes 2 -Systematics and Fossil Record. Pp. 445-468. Verlag Dr. F.
Pfeil, Mnchen.
*Tang,
K. L. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among damselfishes (Teleostei:
Pomacentridae)
as determined by mitochondrial DNA
data. – Copeia 2001 (3): 591-601.
*Tang,
K. L., Berendzen, P. B., Wiley, E. O., Morrissey, J. F., Winterbottom, R. &
Johnson, G.
D. 1999. The phylogenetic
relationships of the suborder Acanthuroidei (Teleostei: Perciformes) based on
morphological and molecular evidence. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11 3):
415-425.
*Tang,
K. L., McNyset, K. M. & Holcroft, N. I. 2004. The phylogenetic position of
five genera
(Acanthochromis, Azurina, Chrysiptera, Dischistodus, and Neopomacentrus) of the family
Pomacentridae (Teleostei: Perciformes). – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30:
823–828.
Taverne,
L. 1996. Ostologie et position systmatique des Tarrasiiformes,
Actinoptrygiens
(Pisces) du Carbonifre de
l'cosse et des Etats-Unis. – Biol. Jb. Dodonaea 64: 138-159.
Taverne,
L. 1997. Osorioichthys marginis, Palonisciformes du Famennien de Belgique, et la
phylognie des Actinoptrygiens
dvoniens (Pisces). – Bull. Inst. Roy. Sci. Natur. Belgique, Sci. Terre
67: 57-78.
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. &
Gibson, T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL W:
improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment
through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix
choice. –
Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680.
Traquair,
R. H. 1877. The ganoid fishes of the British Carboniferous formations. Part I.
Palaeoniscidae. –
Monogr. Palaeontogr.
Soc. 31: 1-60.
Traquair,
R. H. 1901. The ganoid fishes of the British Carboniferous formations. Part I.
Palaeoniscidae. – Monogr.
Palaeontogr. Soc., London 31: 61-87.
Traquair,
R. H. 1907. The ganoid fishes of the British Carboniferous formations. Part I.
Palaeoniscidae. – Monogr.
Palaeontogr. Soc., London 31: 88-106.
Traquair,
R. H. 1909. The ganoid fishes of the British Carboniferous formations. Part I.
Palaeoniscidae. – Monogr.
Palaeontogr. Soc., London 31: 107-122.
Traquair,
R. H. 1912. The ganoid fishes of the British Carboniferous formations. Part I.
Palaeoniscidae. – Monogr. Palaeontogr.
Soc., London 31: 159-180.
Vandepoele,
K., De Vos, W., Taylor, J. S., Meyer, A. & Van de Peer, Y. 2004. Major
events in
the genome
evolution of vertebrates: Paranome age and size differ considerably between
ray-finned
fishes and land vertebrates. – PNAS 101: 1638 –1643.
Venkatesh,
B., Erdmann, M. V. & Brenner, S. 2001.
Molecular synapomorphies resolve
evolutionary relationships of extant
jawed vertebrates. – Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98: 11382-11387.
Wang, C.-H., Kuo, C.-H.,
Mok, H.-K. & Lee, S.-C. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of elopomorph fishes
inferred from mitochondrial 12s ribosoma RNA sequences. – Zool. Scripta
32 (3): 231-241.
*Wellborn,
G. A. & Broughton, R. E. Diversification on an ecologically
constrained adaptive
landscape.
– Amer. Naturalist. (In review.)
Wheeler,
W. C. 1996. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment
in
phylogenetics?
– Cladistics 12: 1-9.
Wheeler,
W. C., Gladstein, D. S. & De Laet, J. 1996-2003. POY: Phylogeny
reconstruction via
optimization of
DNA data. – Computer software distributed by the authors and from
the American
Museum of Natural History, New York: ftp://ftp.amnh.org/pub/molecular/poy.
Wiens, J.
J. 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problems and
solutions. –
Syst. Biol. 50:
689–699.
Wiens, J. J.
2003a. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. – Syst.
Biol. 52:
528–538.
Wiens, J. J.
2003b. Incomplete taxa, incomplete characters, and phylogenetic accuracy: what
is the missing data problem? – J. Vert. Paleontol. 23: 297–310.
*Wiens, J. J. 2004. Speciation and
ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the
origin of species. – Evolution 58:
193–197.
*Wiens, J. J. 2004. What is speciation and how should
we study it? – Amer. Naturalist 163:
914–923.
*Wiens, J. J. 2004. The role of
morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. – Syst. Biol.
53: 653–661.
Wiens, J. J. 2005. Can
incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch
attraction? –
Syst. Biol. 54: 731–742.
*Wiens, J. J. 2006. Missing data and the design of
phylogenetic analyses. – J. Biomed. Informatics 39: 34–42.
*Wiens, J.
J., Bonett, R. M. & Chippindale, P. T. 2005a. Ontogeny discombobulates
phylogeny:
paedomorphosis and
higher-level salamander phylogeny. – Syst. Biol. 54: 91–110.
*Wiens, J. J., Brandley, M. C. & Reeder, T. W. 2006. Why does a trait evolve multiple
times within a clade? Repeated
evolution of snake-like body form in squamate reptiles. – Evolution 61: 123–141.
*Wiens, J. J., Engstrom, T. N. & Chippindale, P.
T. Rapid diversification,
incomplete isolation,
and the speciation clock in
North American salamanders (genus Plethodon). –– Evolution.
(Submitted.)
*Wiens, J.
J., Fetzner, J. W., Parkinson, C. L. & Reeder, T. W. 2005b. Hylid frog
phylogeny and
sampling
strategies for speciose clades. – Syst. Biol. 54: 719–748.
*Wiens, J. J. & Graham, C. H.
2005. Niche conservatism:
integrating evolution, ecology, and
conservation biology. – Ann.
Rev. Ecol., Evol., Syst. 36:519–539.
*Wiens, J. J., Graham, C. H., Moen,
D. S., Smith, S. A. & Reeder, T. W. 2007. Evolutionary and
ecological causes of the latitudinal
diversity gradient in hylid frogs: treefrog trees unearth the
roots of high tropical diversity.
– Amer. Naturalist 168: 579-596.
*Wiens, J. J., Kuczynski, C., Duellman, W. E. & Reeder, T. W. Loss
and re-evolution of complex life cycles in marsupial frogs: can ancestral
reconstruction mislead? – Evolution (Accepted pending revision.).
Wilcox, T.
P., Zwickl, D. J., Heath, T. A. & Hillis, D. M. 2002. Phylogenetic
relationships of the
dwarf
boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic
support. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25: 361–371.
Wiley,
E. O. 1976. The Phylogeny and Biogeography of Fossil and Recent Gars
(Actinopterygii:
Lepisosteidae).
– Univ. Kansas, Mus. Natur. Hist., Miscellan. Publ. 64: 1-111.
*Wiley,
E. O., Johnson, G. D. & Dimmick, W. W. 1998. The phylogenetic relationships
of
lampridiform fishes (Teleostei:
Acanthomorpha), based on a total-evidence analysis of morphological and
molecular data. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10: 417-425.
*Wiley, E. O., Johnson,
G. D. & Dimmick, W. W. 2000. The relationships of acanthomorph fishes: A
total evidence approach using molecular and morphological data. –
Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 28:319-350.
Woodward,
A. S. 1891. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural
History).
Part II. Containing the
Elasmobranchii (Acanthodii), Holocephali, Ichthyodorulites, Ostracodermi,
Dipnoi, and Teleostomi (Crossopterygii and Chondostean Actinopterygii). –
British Museum (Natural History), London. XLIV + 567 pp.
Woodward,
A. S. 1895. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural
History).
Part III. Containing the
Actinopterygian Teleostomi of the Orders Chondrostei (concluded),
Protospondyli, Aetheospondyli, and Isospondyli (in part). – British
Museum (Natural History), London. XLII + 544 pp.
Zhang,
J.-Y. 1998. Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of Kuntulunia (Teleostei:
Osteoglossomorpha).
– J. Vert. Paleontol. 18(2): 280-300.
Zhang,
J.-Y. 2004. New fossil osteoglossomorph from Ningxia, China. – J. Vert.
Paleontol.
24(3): 515-524.
Zhang,
J.-Y. 2006. Phylogeny of the osteoglossomorpha. – Vert. PalAsiatica 2006:
43-59.
Zhu,
M. & Schultze, H.-P. 2001. Interrelationships of basal osteichthyans.
– In Ahlberg, P. E.
(ed.): Major Events in Early
Vertebrate Evolution. Palaeontology, Phylogeny, Genetics and Development.
Systematics Association Special Volume Series 61: 289-314. Taylor &
Francis, London and New York.
Zhu,
M., Yu, X. & Janvier, P. 1999. A primitive fossil fish sheds light on the
origin of bony fishes.
Nature 397: 607-610.